Risk stratification and prognosis prediction using cardiac biomarkers in COVID-19: a single-centre retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: There is a need for a robust tool to stratify the patient's risk with COVID-19. We assessed the prognostic values of cardiac biomarkers for COVID-19 patients. METHODS: This is a single-centre retrospective cohort study. Consecutive laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 patients admitted to the Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital from July 2020 to September 2021 were included. We obtained cardiac biomarker values from electronic health records and institutional blood banks. We stratified patients with cardiac biomarkers as high-sensitive troponin I (hsTnI), N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), creatine kinase (CK) and CK myocardial band (CK-MB), using the clinically relevant thresholds. Prespecified primary outcome measure was all-cause death. RESULTS: A total of 917 patients were included. hsTnI, NT-proBNP, CK and CK-MB were associated with the significantly higher cumulative 30-day incidence of all-cause death (hsTnI: <5.0 ng/L group; 4.3%, 5.0 ng/L-99%ile upper reference limit (URL) group; 8.8% and ≥99% ile URL group; 25.2%, p<0.001. NT-proBNP: <125 pg/mL group; 5.3%, 125-900 pg/mL group; 10.5% and ≥900 pg/mL group; 31.9%, p<0.001. CK:

Association of HFA-PEFF score with clinical outcomes after catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: The Heart Failure Association Pretest assessment, echocardiography and natriuretic peptide, functional testing and final aetiology (HFA-PEFF) score has been developed for diagnosing heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), which is frequently associated with atrial fibrillation (AF). We aimed to investigate whether preprocedural HFA-PEFF score could be used to predict clinical outcomes in patients with AF who underwent catheter ablation (CA). METHODS: Overall, 1679 patients with AF who underwent primary CA (71±10 years, 1218 males (72.5%), median follow-up duration 3.3 years) from July 2011 to December 2019 were included in this retrospective study. HFpEF was defined as an HFA-PEFF score ≥5. The primary study outcome was 5-year major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), which is a composite of all-cause death, hospitalisation for heart failure (HF) and hospitalisation for stroke. RESULTS: The prevalence of HFpEF was 32.3%, but only 7.7% were diagnosed with HF at the time of CHADS2 scoring. Five-year MACCE occurred in 77 patients (4.6%). The cumulative 5-year incidence of MACCE was significantly higher in the HFpEF group than in the non-HFpEF group (11.2% vs 4.8% at 5 years, p<0.001). In the multivariable analysis, HFpEF by the HFA-PEFF score was associated with MACCE (adjusted HR 1.65, 95% CI 1.02 to 2.65, p=0.041). CONCLUSIONS: Early detection of HFpEF using the HFA-PEFF score may have clinical applications in guiding therapeutic decision-making and improving prognosis by preventing HF and stroke in patients with AF undergoing CA.

Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation Patients on Hemodialysis (From the Kansai Plus Atrial Fibrillation Registry)　- Clinical Impact of Early Recurrence.

BACKGROUND: Catheter ablation (CA) for atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients on hemodialysis (HD) is reported to have a high risk of late recurrence (LR). However, the relationship between early recurrence (ER) within a 90-day blanking period after CA in AF patients and LR in HD patients remains unclear.Methods and Results: Of the 5,010 patients in the Kansai Plus Atrial Fibrillation Registry, 5,009 were included in the present study. Of these patients, 4,942 were not on HD (non-HD group) and 67 were on HD (HD group). HD was an independent risk factor for LR after the initial CA (adjusted hazard ratio 1.6; 95% confidence interval 1.1-2.2; P=0.01). In patients with ER, the rate of sinus rhythm maintenance at 3 years after the initial CA was significantly lower in the HD than non-HD group (11.4% vs. 35.4%, respectively; log-rank P=0.004). However, in patients without ER, there was no significant difference in the rate of sinus rhythm maintenance at 3 years between the HD and non-HD groups (67.7% vs. 74.5%, respectively; log-rank P=0.62). CONCLUSIONS: ER in HD patients was a strong risk factor for LR. However, even HD patients could expect a good outcome without ER after the initial CA.

Characteristics of two different cryoballoon systems for treatment of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: study protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled trial (CONTRAST-CRYO Trial).

BACKGROUND: Single-shot pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) utilizing cryothermal energy is an effective and safe treatment for atrial fibrillation (AF) patients. A novel cryoballoon system, POLARx™, has been recently introduced. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy, safety, and biophysical parameters of PVI between the novel cryoballoon system, POLARx™, and the standard cryoballoon system, Arctic Front Advance Pro™ (AFA-Pro), in patients with paroxysmal AF. METHODS: The CONTRAST-CRYO trial is a prospective, multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled study performed at seven large cardiac centers. This study was approved by the central ethics committee or the local ethics committee of each participating hospital and has been registered at UMIN Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN000049948). The trial will assign 200 patients with paroxysmal AF undergoing PVI to POLARx™ and AFA-Pro in a 1:1 randomization. The primary endpoint is the one-shot acute success rate of the right inferior pulmonary vein. Second endpoints include freedom from documented atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter, or atrial tachycardia without antiarrhythmic drugs at 12 months after the procedure, freedom from re-do procedures, the incidence of procedure-related adverse events, freezing duration, and the biophysical parameters during applications for each PV, total procedure and fluoroscopy time, and PVI durability during re-do procedures. CONCLUSION: The CONTRAST-CRYO trial is a prospective, multicenter, randomized study designed to elucidate the difference in the efficacy, safety, and biophysical parameters between POLARx™ and AFA-Pro in paroxysmal AF patients undergoing PVI. The findings from this trial may provide a valuable indication for selecting the optimal cryoballoon system. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION:  UMIN000049948.

Symptomatic periesophageal vagal nerve injury by different energy sources during atrial fibrillation ablation.

Background: Symptomatic gastric hypomotility (SGH) is a rare but major complication of atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation, but data on this are scarce. Objective: We compared the clinical course of SGH occurring with different energy sources. Methods: This multicenter study retrospectively collected the characteristics and clinical outcomes of patients with SGH after AF ablation. Results: The data of 93 patients (67.0 ± 11.2 years, 68 men, 52 paroxysmal AF) with SGH after AF ablation were collected from 23 cardiovascular centers. Left atrial (LA) ablation sets included pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) alone, a PVI plus a roof-line, and an LA posterior wall isolation in 42 (45.2%), 11 (11.8%), and 40 (43.0%) patients, respectively. LA ablation was performed by radiofrequency ablation, cryoballoon ablation, or both in 38 (40.8%), 38 (40.8%), and 17 (18.3%) patients, respectively. SGH diagnoses were confirmed at 2 (1-4) days post-procedure, and 28 (30.1%) patients required re-hospitalizations. Fasting was required in 81 (92.0%) patients for 4 (2.5-5) days; the total hospitalization duration was 11 [7-19.8] days. After conservative treatment, symptoms disappeared in 22.3% of patients at 1 month, 48.9% at 2 months, 57.6% at 3 months, 84.6% at 6 months, and 89.7% at 12 months, however, one patient required surgery after radiofrequency ablation. Symptoms persisted for >1-year post-procedure in 7 patients. The outcomes were similar regardless of the energy source and LA lesion set. Conclusions: The clinical course of SGH was similar regardless of the energy source. The diagnosis was often delayed, and most recovered within 6 months, yet could persist for over 1 year in 10%.

Initial multicenter clinical experience with the first-generation endoscopic guided laser balloon in Japan.

BACKGROUND: Isolation of the pulmonary veins (PVs) is the golden standard for atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. To achieve a permanent PV isolation, the endoscopic guided HeartLight laser balloon system was invented. We analyzed the safety and efficacy of this laser balloon system. METHODS AND RESULTS: Three hundred four patients from 21 investigational sites inside Japan were enrolled in this study. One thousand sixty-two out of 1175 PVs (90.4%) were isolated using the HeartLight laser balloon. The isolation rate of the left superior, left inferior, right superior, and right inferior PVs was 87.8%, 91.3%, 91.6%, and 92.1%, respectively. The procedure time, defined as the time from the venous access to taking out the balloon, was 155 ± 39 min. The fluoroscopic time was 44 ± 25 min. The mean follow-up period was 309 ± 125 days. The freedom from AF recurrence at 3 months was 89.0% and at 12 months 82.1%. Adverse events occurred in 22 patients (7.2%) including phrenic nerve injury lasting more than 3 months in 1.6% and strokes in 1.0% of the patients. CONCLUSIONS: This initial experience demonstrated that the laser balloon ablation was feasible for PV isolation in Japanese AF patients.

Importance of the relative epicardial connection locations and right-sided pulmonary vein isolation line for successful pulmonary vein isolation.

INTRODUCTION: The presence of an epicardial connection (EC) decreases the success rate of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI); however, the effect of designing isolation lines has not been evaluated. We sought to clarify the effects of designing an anterior line for right-sided PVI considering the presence and location of the EC. METHODS: Seventy-four consecutive patients who underwent initial catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation were retrospectively included in this study. The presence of the EC was determined by the left atrial (LA) activation map during right atrial pacing, and patients were divided into EC-positive (n = 23, 31%) and EC-negative (n = 51, 69%) groups. EC-positive patients were further subdivided based on the EC location: on-the-line group, (EC on the PVI line, n = 11); inside-line group (EC on the pulmonary vein [PV] side, n = 10); and outside-line group (EC on the LA side, n = 2). The PVI parameters were compared among the three groups. RESULTS: The success rates of the first-pass isolation were comparable between the EC-negative and EC-positive groups (70.6% vs. 60.9%, ns), but the success rate was significantly higher in the on-the-line group than in the inside-line group (91% vs. 20%, p = 0.002). First-pass isolation was successful in both patients in the outside-line group. Additional carina ablation was required only in the inside-line group. CONCLUSIONS: The association between the EC site and the right-sided PV anterior isolation line affected the success rate of first-pass isolation. For successful right-sided PVI, it is important to consider the EC site when designing the PVI line.

Atrial Fibrillation Ablation Outcomes and Heart Failure (from the Kansai Plus Atrial Fibrillation Registry).

The impact of rhythm outcomes on heart failure (HF) hospitalizations remains unknown after radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) of atrial fibrillation (AF). We sought to elucidate whether AF recurrence was associated with HF hospitalizations after AF RFCA. We conducted a large-scale, prospective, multicenter, observational study (Kansai Plus Atrial Fibrillation Registry), enrolling 5,010 consecutive patients (age 64 ± 10 years, 27.3% female, and 35.7% nonparoxysmal AF) who underwent an initial AF RFCA at 26 centers. The median follow-up duration was 2.9 years. The cumulative 3-year incidence of HF hospitalizations after the initial RFCA was 1.84% (0.69%/year). Hospitalized patients with HF were older with a higher prevalence of nonparoxysmal AF, renal dysfunction, diabetes, and underlying heart disease pre-RFCA. HF hospitalizations occurred more often in patients with than without recurrences (3.27 vs 0.84%, log-rank p <0.0001). After adjusting for confounders using a Cox model, AF recurrence remained an independent predictor of HF hospitalizations (hazard ratio [HR] 2.84, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.80 to 4.47, p <0.0001). AF recurrence was a distinct HF hospitalization risk in patients with a left ventricular ejection fraction ≥50% (HR 4.54, 95% CI 2.38 to 8.65, p <0.0001) but not <50% (HR 1.31, 95% CI 0.65 to 2.62, p = 0.45), with significant interactions. Furthermore, patients with AF recurrences within 1 year had a greater HF hospitalization risk after 1 year (1.61% vs 0.79%, log-rank p = 0.019). In conclusion, AF recurrence after RFCA was independently associated with HF hospitalizations.

Long-Term Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Severe Tricuspid Regurgitation.

Background The natural history and optimal interventional timing in patients with isolated severe tricuspid regurgitation (TR) have not been well studied. This study aimed to investigate long-term clinical outcomes and risk factors associated with poor prognosis in patients with isolated severe TR. Methods and Results Consecutive transthoracic echocardiographic examinations in 2877 patients with isolated severe TR were retrospectively reviewed. Patients with significant left-sided valve disease or repeated examinations were excluded. Primary outcome was defined as a composite of all-cause death and hospitalization for heart failure. Among the 613 enrolled patients (mean age, 74±13 years; men, 38%), 141 died, and 62 were hospitalized for heart failure during the median follow-up period of 26.5 (interquartile range, 6.0-57.9) months. The 5-year event-free rate was 60.1%. TR pressure gradient (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 1.03 [95% CI, 1.01-1.04]), blood urea nitrogen (adjusted HR, 1.02 [95% CI, 1.01-1.04]), left atrial volume index (adjusted HR, 1.01 [95% CI, 1.002-1.02]), and serum albumin (adjusted HR, 0.56 [95% CI, 0.36-0.95]) were identified as independent predictors of adverse events. A risk model based on the 4 clinical factors that included pulmonary hypertension (TR pressure gradient >40 mm Hg), elevated blood urea nitrogen levels (>25 mg/dL), decreased albumin levels (<3.7 g/dL), and left atrial enlargement (left atrial volume index <34 mL/m2) revealed a graded increase in the risk of adverse events (P<0.001). Conclusions The prognosis of isolated severe TR is not always favorable. Careful attention should be paid to patients with concomitant risk factors, such as pulmonary hypertension, elevated blood urea nitrogen levels, decreased albumin levels, and left atrial enlargement.

Catheter Ablation for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation With Sick Sinus Syndrome: Insights From the Kansai Plus Atrial Fibrillation Registry.

BACKGROUND: Coexisting sick sinus syndrome (SSS) is associated with both electrical and structural atrial remodelling in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Limited data are available concerning catheter ablation (CA) for AF in this condition. This study investigated the efficacy of CA as a curative therapy for AF and SSS in a large-scale prospective multicentre registry. METHODS: The Kansai Plus Atrial Fibrillation (KPAF) registry enrolled 5,010 consecutive patients who underwent CA for AF; this included 3,133 patients with paroxysmal AF (mean age, 66 years; male, 69.3%; mean CHA2DS2-VASc score, 2.05±1.50; SSS, n=315 [tachy-brady syndrome, n=285]). The endpoints included the recurrence of AF with a blanking period of 90 days after CA, and de novo pacemaker implantation during the follow-up period (median duration, 2.93 years). RESULTS: The AF-free survival did not significantly differ between patients with and those without SSS (n=2,818) after the initial (log-rank p=0.864) and final sessions (log-rank p=0.268). Pacemakers were implanted in 48 patients with SSS, and implantation in this group was significantly associated with AF recurrence, including early recurrence (adjusted odds ratio, 3.57; 95% confidence interval, 1.67-7.64; p=0.002). The remaining 85.3% of patients with SSS did not require pacemaker implantation at 3 years after CA. CONCLUSIONS: Coexisting SSS did not adversely affect recurrence-free survival after CA for paroxysmal AF. Pacemaker implantation was not required in most patients with SSS, with AF recurrence serving as a strong predictor for this.

Diagnostic Accuracy of the 2016 Guideline-Based Echocardiographic Algorithm to Estimate Invasively-Measured Left Atrial Pressure by Direct Atrial Cannulation.

BACKGROUND: Although estimation of left ventricular filling pressure (LVFP) using an integrated echocardiographic algorithm is recommended, the usefulness of this algorithm has not been fully validated. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to investigate the reliability of an algorithmic classification system using invasively measured left atrial pressure (LAP) in a large-scale cohort. METHODS: The authors enrolled 1,967 patients (age 68 ± 10 years) whose LAP was directly measured within the left atrium during catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation. Patients were classified into 3 groups based on the echocardiographic algorithm: normal (group N, n = 1,282), undetermined (group U, n = 160), and elevated (group E, n = 346) LAP groups. Invasively measured LAP and echocardiographic parameters estimating LVFP were compared among the groups. RESULTS: The median LAP was 12.6 ± 5.7 mm Hg in the entire cohort. LAP was significantly higher in group E than that in the other groups (groups E vs U vs N, 14.2 ± 6.3 mm Hg vs 13.5 ± 5.9 mm Hg vs 12.0 ± 5.5 mm Hg; P < 0.001). Among group E patients, 43.1% had elevated LAP (≥15 mm Hg), whereas 56.9% had normal LAP (<15 mm Hg). Of the patients in group N, 69.0% had normal LAP, whereas 31% had elevated LAP. Although the correlation between invasively measured LAP and E/e', peak tricuspid regurgitant velocity, and left atrial volume index was modest, the number of abnormal values correlated significantly with elevated LAP (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The classification using combined echocardiographic parameters in the recommendations may be useful for detecting patients with normal LVFP but may be limited for detecting elevated LVFP.

Effectiveness of a manual dragging laser irradiation technique using the first-generation endoscopic laser balloon ablation system for pulmonary vein isolation.

Background: Although high efficacy of laser balloon (LB) ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) has been shown, the conventional point-by-point technique requires a long procedure time. We investigated the clinical effectiveness of the manual dragging laser technique. Methods: We enrolled 51 consecutive patients with paroxysmal AF who underwent pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) using first-generation LB (LB1) at our institution. The first 25 patients underwent PVI using a point-by-point laser irradiation maneuver (point-by-point group). The latter 26 patients underwent PVI using a manually dragging laser irradiation maneuver (dragging group). The power and delivery time for the laser energy were selected from a preset protocol with 5.5-12 W and 20-30 s for each application. The dragging irradiation method was performed by manually rotating approximately 1.5°/s during one irradiation application. Results: PVI was successful in all cases. The duration of PVI was shorter (66 ± 20 vs. 116 ± 39 min, p < 0.0001), and the number of laser irradiations for the 4PVs were significantly less in the dragging group. There were four recurrent cases (16%) in the point-by-point group and 1 (4%) in the dragging group. There was no significant difference in the survival rate free from recurrence after the blanking period between the two groups (log-rank p = 0.1570). The complications were similar between the groups (4% vs. 4%, ns). Conclusions: The manual dragging laser irradiation technique using LB1 could shorten the PVI procedure time while preserving clinical effectiveness.

Efficacy of left atrial posterior wall isolation guided by lesion size prediction module for non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.

AIMS: The efficacy of left atrial posterior wall isolation (PWI) is controversial. Lesion durability may be a major cause of arrhythmia recurrence. The use of the lesion size prediction module improves lesion durability. This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) alone and PWI in addition to PVI (PVI + PWI) in patients with non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) using a lesion size prediction module. METHODS AND RESULTS: This study is a sub-analysis of the recently published prospective multicentre observational study called ALCOHOL-AF (association of alcohol consumption with outcome of catheter ablation of AF). In this sub-analysis, patients with non-paroxysmal AF in whom PVI alone or PVI + PWI was performed using the lesion size prediction module were included. Freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmia was compared between PVI alone and PVI + PWI groups using propensity score analyses. Of the 3474 patients registered in the ALCOHOL-AF study, 572 patients (age 65.6 ± 10.1 years, male 77.4%, longstanding persistent AF 25.5%) were included in this sub-analysis. We selected 212 patients treated with PVI alone and 212 treated with PVI + PWI using one-to-one propensity score matching. During the follow-up period, atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence was documented in 92 (43.4%) and 50 (23.6%) patients in the PVI alone and PVI + PWI groups, respectively. Freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence without anti-arrhythmic drugs after a single procedure was significantly higher in PVI + PWI than in PVI alone groups (hazard ratio: 0.452, 95% confidence interval: 0.308-0.664, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: In this hypothesis-generating study, lesion size prediction module-guided PVI + PWI was associated with better clinical outcomes than PVI alone in patients with persistent or longstanding persistent AF.

Cryoballoon ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation in Japan: 2-year safety and efficacy results from the Cryo AF Global Registry.

PURPOSE: Catheter ablation is a recommended rhythm control therapy after failed or intolerant antiarrhythmic drug (AAD) treatment for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). This study evaluates clinical performance and safety of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) using the cryoballoon (Arctic Front Advance) in Japan. METHODS: Cryo AF Global Registry is a prospective, multi-center registry. Patients with paroxysmal AF (PAF) were treated at 10 Japanese hospitals. Efficacy was evaluated by freedom from a ≥ 30-s recurrence of AF/atrial flutter (AFL)/atrial tachycardia (AT), AF-related symptoms, and quality of life using the EQ-5D-3L questionnaire. The safety endpoint was serious device- and procedure-related adverse events. RESULTS: The study included 352 patients with PAF (65 ± 10 years of age, 36% female, 36% without prior failure of AAD). Mean duration since first diagnosis of AF was 3.0 ± 5.5 years. Serious device- and procedure-related adverse event rate was 2.6% (95% CI: 1.2-4.8%). Freedom from AF/AFL/AT was 88.5% (95% CI: 84.7-91.4%) at 12 months and 86.7% (95% CI: 81.1-90.8%) at 24 months. The number of patients with ≥ 1 AF symptom was significantly decreased from 88% at enrollment to 22% (p < 0.01) at 12-month follow-up. General quality of life using EQ-5D did not improve significantly after 12 months in the summary score. However, in the visual analog scale score, there was improvement (5.8 ± 18.4; p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that cryoablation used for PVI is a safe and effective treatment in real-world use for patients with PAF in Japan.

Mechanism of improvement in atrial functional mitral regurgitation after catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation: Three-dimensional analysis using multislice computed tomography.

BACKGROUND: Several factors associated with atrial functional mitral regurgitation development have been reported; however, geometric changes in the mitral apparatus after catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation have not been sufficiently investigated. This study aimed to clarify what determines improvements in atrial functional mitral regurgitation after sinus rhythm restoration in patients who underwent catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation by using multislice computed tomography. METHODS: We analysed volumetric multislice computed tomography images of 44 atrial fibrillation patients with significant atrial functional mitral regurgitation (moderate or worse) before and after catheter ablation. We measured the three-dimensional geometry of the mitral apparatus including the mitral annular area and interpapillary muscle distance. We calculated the differences before and after catheter ablation (Δmitral annular area, Δinterpapillary muscle distance) and assessed mitral regurgitation severity based on the mitral regurgitant jet area and its changes before and after catheter ablation (Δjet area) using transthoracic echocardiography. RESULTS: After catheter ablation, the jet area was significantly decreased. The left ventricular ejection fraction was significantly increased and the left ventricular volume had a decreasing trend. The Δjet area was significantly correlated with the Δinterpapillary muscle distance (r = .43; p = .004). The Δinterpapillary muscle distance was the strongest determinant of improvements in atrial functional mitral regurgitation severity (p = .026). CONCLUSIONS: Decreased interpapillary muscle distance was strongly associated with improvements in atrial functional mitral regurgitation. Amelioration of left ventricular dysfunction by sinus rhythm restoration might be related to improvements in atrial functional mitral regurgitation after catheter ablation.

Long-term prognosis of patients undergoing radiofrequency catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation: comparison between heart failure subtypes based on left ventricular ejection fraction.

AIMS: Heart failure (HF) prognosis has been reported similar in patients with preserved vs. reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). This study compared the long-term prognosis of HF patients undergoing radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) for atrial fibrillation (AF). METHODS AND RESULTS: Among 5010 patients undergoing RFCA in Kansai Plus AF registry, 656 patients (13.1%) with a documented history of HF were enrolled in the study before RFCA. The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause death, HF hospitalization, and stroke or systemic embolism. Patients with reduced (<40%), mid-range (40-49%), and preserved (≥50%) LVEF were 98 (14.9%), 107 (16.3%), and 451 (68.8%) patients, respectively. The prevalence of ischaemic heart disease and cardiomyopathies was higher among patients with reduced as compared with preserved LVEF (27.6% vs. 10.0%, P < 0.05 and 36.7% vs. 15.3%, P < 0.05, respectively). The median follow-up period was 2.9 years. The 3-year cumulative risk for the primary endpoint was higher in patients with reduced LVEF (32.7%) compared to those with mid-range (11.7%) or preserved (11.6%) LVEF (P < 0.001). Reduced LVEF was the most significant independent risk factor for primary endpoint (hazard ratio, 2.83; 95% confidence interval 1.74-4.61, P < 0.001). The 3-year arrhythmia recurrence rate was similar among the groups (48.2%, 42.8%, and 47.3%, respectively, P = 0.75). CONCLUSION: This study raises hypothesis that patients with HFrEF and AF had approximately three times higher risk for a composite of all-cause death, HF hospitalization, and stroke or systemic embolism after AF ablation compared with patients with HFmrEF or HFpEF.

Comparison of Cryoballoon and Contact Force-Sensing Radiofrequency Ablation for Persistent Atrial Fibrillation in Clinical Practice.

BACKGROUND: Outcomes of cryoballoon ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) are unclear, especially in Japanese patients, so the effectiveness and safety of cryoballoon ablation in clinical practice were retrospectively compared with those of contact force-sensing radiofrequency (CFRF) ablation including the high-power protocol.Methods and Results:Consecutive patients with persistent AF were reviewed, and 253 and 265 patients who underwent cryoballoon and CFRF ablation, respectively, were enrolled. The primary endpoint was atrial arrhythmia recurrence. The secondary endpoints were periprocedural complications and repeat ablation. The rate of additional left atrial (LA) ablation after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) was similar between groups (68.8% cryoballoon vs. 74.0% CFRF, P=0.19). Freedom from atrial arrhythmia recurrence was comparable between groups over a follow-up of 25.5±12.5 months (72.3% cryoballoon vs. 69.8% CFRF; adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 0.85, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.59-1.21, P=0.36). Outcomes were similar in the subgroups of PVI alone and PVI plus additional LA ablation. LA posterior wall isolation, absence of defragmentation, and low creatine clearance, but not catheter selection, were associated with the primary endpoint. Periprocedural complications (adjusted HR 0.73, 95% CI 0.34-1.54, P=0.41) and repeat ablation (adjusted HR 1.11, 95% CI 0.71-1.74, P=0.64) were similar for both procedures. CONCLUSIONS: Cryoballoon ablation for persistent AF in Japanese clinical practice had acceptable outcomes comparable to those of advanced CFRF ablation.

Early experiences with three types of balloon-based ablation catheters in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: Although balloon-based ablation catheters are expected to improve the feasibility and quality of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), they must be introduced to physicians in the proper setting to ensure their correct usage. OBJECTIVE: To identify the optimal clinical settings for learning the techniques for 3 balloon-based ablation catheters (Cryoballoon, Hotballoon, and Laserballoon). METHODS: We introduced 3 balloon catheters in 50 consecutive patients with paroxysmal AF each during the introduction periods. Clinical parameters were compared among the groups and between these groups and their steady-state controls. RESULTS: The completion rate of PVI by sole balloon procedures was 56% with the Hotballoon catheter, which was lower than those of the Cryoballoon and Laserballoon catheters (each 88%). Radiofrequency touch-up was most frequently required at the bottom aspect of the inferior pulmonary veins (PVs) in the Cryoballoon group and at the anterior aspect of the superior PVs in the Hotballoon and Laserballoon groups. The Laserballoon catheter had the longest average PVI procedural time (89.2 ± 40 vs 58.4 ± 22 minutes for Hotballoon, 65.1 ± 25 minutes for Cryoballoon, P < .001), but the difference was ultimately removed by the learning curve. There was no significant difference in the major complication or recurrence-free survival rates among the catheter types. CONCLUSIONS: All 3 balloon-based catheter types allowed feasibility and quality for PVI, even during the learning period. To introduce these new catheters without complications, an experiences of 20 cases with specific clinical settings should be met for each catheter type.